Named the form of thoughts that could not be described because of his abstract.
The trend to want to describe the Lord in the form of the statue was some idea the feeling of the love (the service).
As in the case of if a young man fell in love with his sweetheart, down to the level madness (be crazy about) then the bolster was also embraced by him very tight like as his sweetheart, he wanted to depict his sweetheart with poems that be full of idiom an like for example: his eyes like the east star, his face like the full moon, his lip like the pomegranate cracked et cetera.
If being thought about by us calmly, if having the person that his eyes as the east star and his face were round like the full moon, perhaps could not we named the person that so that was pretty.
All that was only a symbol, expression from the feeling of the love.
Likewise Hindu group that be crazy about wanted to depict his Lord by making the statue as the realisation of the feeling of his love, be decorated and worshipped, and have not been thought about in heart him that the statue was a wood statue that was carved.
Perhaps did not have his difference with the flag ceremony where being not thought about in our heart, that that was honoured by us upright and respect only a strip of cloth that by chance was the flag.
The abstract lord had difficulty being understood by the layman, as in the case of the class schoolchild zero small, if being taught by knowledge to count he could not imagine how many three more three that, because of the understanding three that was some that the abstract, then for that of Ms Guru was forced to depict circles that had the shape of the egg on the board totalling three more three, while asked to children: This the picture whether children?
Ask Ms Guru.
The egg answered children.
How many of them children?
Ask Ms Guru.
Then child-child also counted available circles on the board that he considered the egg and they could answer him exactly.