If at that time had a student saw Ms Guru taught by means of like this, then the student could reprimanded Ms Guru with words that blamed: Ms Guru should be not taught by lying children, that the Mother wrote on the board that not the egg, but the lime, why Ms Guru said to children that that the egg?
By that means whether Ms Guru do wronged or told lies?
Certainly not?
For children who were not yet able to imagine some that the abstract needed visualisation (the show), and the example must not must exact, likewise the layman had difficulty imagining the Lord not have the shape of, they could not imagine the Lord was because of his eyes had not seen.
They also.
Had not understood if the Lord not have the shape of, why was made the temple or the Temple.
The lord did not need the house and did not need the place!
Sacrifice
If we saw Hindu group brought the offering to the Temple was full of the fruit and delicious food, certainly the person will think whether the Lord of Hindu group like humankind, liked to eat that be good-be good.
Likewise if the Temple in decorated and in carved so beautiful, possibly the person thought, the Lord of Hindu group liked art, and liked also watched the dance.
as philosophy we could say that the Lord mighty, he created the universe, he held all food and he created all beauty, he will not be hungry if we did not present the offering.
Meaning that our dedication that was as small as this in the eyes of the Lord, whereas he had this universe all!
The lord did not need all this, only humankind that regarded this.
Necessarily, all the offerings and this art only as the implement to bring about the feeling of the service or his love to the Lord.
In the heart of the loving person wanted him to give all what he had,